FCC Delays Controversial TCPA Revocation Rule — Does the Mortgage Industry Get More Breathing Room?

The Federal Communications Commission has delayed implementation of its controversial “one-revocation-fits-all” TCPA rule–again.

Originally adopted in February 2024, the rule governing consent revocation for robocalls and robotexts is now scheduled to take effect January 31, 2027 according to a recent FCC order.

For mortgage lenders and servicers, the delay is significant.

What Would the Rule Require?

The rule generally is intended to simplify how consumers revoke consent for automated communications. It allows revocation using “any reasonable method” and prohibits companies from requiring consumers to use a single designated opt-out channel.

At a high level, that concept alone seems manageable.

The real concern lies in the rule’s blanket revocation requirement.

As written, if a consumer revokes consent in response to one type of automated message, that revocation generally must apply to all future robocalls and robotexts from that company, even if unrelated.

Why Does It Matter?

Consider this scenario:

A borrower texts “STOP” in response to a promotional message about a servicer’s mobile app.

Under the rule, that revocation could block for example:

• Payment reminders

• Escrow shortage notices

• Critical account servicing communications

In short, a marketing opt-out could eliminate essential loan servicing messages and create significant operational, regulatory, and consumer risk.

Why Does the FCC Keeps Delaying?

The original effective date was last year, but that date was delayed to this year, and now it has been pushed back again to January 31, 2027.

Last year, the FCC reopened the issue and requested public comment on whether the all-or-nothing revocation framework should be modified.

The Commission specifically asked whether consumers should instead have granular control, for example, opting out of marketing texts without losing critical account notifications.

Notably, both industry groups and consumer advocates requested delay and reconsideration. That alignment signals meaningful concern about unintended consequences.

What Are the Strategic Implications for Mortgage Executives?

The delay does not eliminate TCPA risk. It simply preserves the current framework for now.

Meanwhile, mortgage companies should use this window to:

• Evaluate Communication Segmentation: Are servicing, compliance, and marketing communications operationally distinguishable?

• Audit Opt-Out Infrastructure: Can systems track consent revocation by message type if a granular rule ultimately replaces the blanket approach?

• Review Vendor Coordination: Can third-party platforms handling texts and robocalls align with compliance protocols and are the vendors staying abreast of these issues?

• Monitor the Rulemaking Closely: Could the final rule look materially different in 2027?

Bottom Line?

The FCC’s repeated delay suggests the “one revocation applies to everything” model may not survive intact.

For mortgage lenders and servicers, the core issue is not just TCPA technical compliance. It is operational continuity. An overly broad revocation standard could disrupt servicing workflows and create regulatory exposure under separate consumer protection regimes.

For now, the status quo remains. But January 2027 will arrive quickly.

Mortgage companies should use this runway to strengthen communication governance and ensure they are prepared, whether the FCC finalizes the rule as written or adopts a more nuanced alternative.

Need help evaluating your platform relationships or practices? Contact troy@garrishorn.com for more information.